HOME
home 
acerca de icg 
programas
  Africa 
  Asia 
  Europa 
  America Latina 
  Oriente Medio 
  Investigación Temática 
publicaciones
  por región 
  por fecha 
  por palabra clave 
crisiswatch 
medios de comunicación
  comunicados de Prensa 
  artículos de opinión 
  discursos 
  oficina de prensa 
contacta con icg 
como colaborar con icg 
ofertas de empleo 
enlaces 

 subscribe
 home  programs  africa  horn of africa  sudan
search
 
  Sudan's Peace Process

Nairobi/Brussels, 7 July 2003: Sudan’s peace process is entering its final, most difficult phase. As President George W. Bush begins his tour of Africa, he has an opportunity to help end one of the world’s longest-running and most destructive wars.

A new report by the International Crisis Group (ICG), Sudan Endgame* says it is essential that the United States makes a clear commitment to its bilateral relationship with Sudan and to remain closely involved with the post-agreement process. In particular ICG urges the U.S. and other international actors to sequence the lifting of sanctions and provision of assistance on conclusion and implementation of the peace agreement.

ICG Special Adviser on Africa John Prendergast said: “The U.S. must put its bilateral relationship with the Sudan government on the table in the service of the peace deal. Without serious U.S. commitments and high-level engagement, a lasting deal is less likely. With them, peace has a chance in Sudan”.

The government in Khartoum and the Sudanese Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA) in the South took an important step with the Machakos Protocol a year ago – effectively trading a southern self-determination referendum for sharia law in the North. However, a second such deal is needed if outstanding issues such as the status of the national capital, the presidency and security arrangements are to be resolved.

“The time has come for a second 'grand bargain' between the government and SPLA”, said ICG President Gareth Evans. “Such a bargain will require a set of major tradeoffs – or new solutions – that meets the bottom lines of the parties, protects earlier agreements, and creates incentives for the implementation of the accord”.

The key to a sustainable agreement will be whether it can prioritise the preservation of unity – and address conflict areas outside the South. A minimalist deal can be reached that stops the war for now and puts the South on a fast track to independence. However such an agreement would be systematically undermined by key actors in the ruling party in Khartoum and likely to lead to the resumption of war.

Despite the imperative to stress unity, independence for the South must remain a valid and acceptable possible outcome of the referendum, as a fundamental confidence building measure for southerners to give a unified state a chance. To avoid future conflict, the parties should also agree now on provisions that would come into effect should the South vote for independence after the six-year interim period.


MEDIA CONTACTS
Katy Cronin (London) +44 20 7981 0330 [email protected]
Francesca Lawe-Davies (Brussels) +32-(0)2-536 00 65
Jennifer Leonard (Washington) +1-202-785 1601
All ICG reports are available on our website: http://www.crisisweb.org/

The International Crisis Group (ICG) is an independent, non-profit, multinational organisation, with over 90 staff members on five continents, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.


comments


copyright privacy sitemap